Method
Every claim on this site is grounded in a source someone actually opened. That rule is the whole product, so here is how it works.
Four tiers of evidence
- The corpus. A library of mythology scholarship held locally and searched directly. A passage we can quote and locate is assertable.
- A primary source we opened. An edition, a publisher record, a rights-holder’s own listing. Assertable, with the URL and the date we read it.
- A real source we have not read. We may plan around it. We do not publish it.
- An untraceable claim. Dropped. No exceptions for how plausible it sounds.
Why so little is published
463 figures are published, with 1663 myths sourced to a primary text and a corpus book. Of the modern works candidate-matched against those figures,only 320 have a human-reviewed, confirmed join to a specific myth. Those are the cards under each myth. The rest, 3,872 in total, are catalogued for completeness but not editorially curated: a candidate match, not a confirmed rework.
General-purpose reference sites found those candidates. They are the shovel, not the exhibit. This site never cites one of them as a source for what a work does or how it relates to a myth. That job belongs to the work itself, or to nothing.
What a citation shows
A myth fact cites the primary text by stanza or chapter, plus the corpus book that carries it. A scholarly dispute names the scholar and the view. What a modern work does is cited to the work itself, its own title as its source. None of it is collapsed or hidden behind a toggle. If you cannot check a claim here, that is a fault, and it is one you should be able to see.